Nation founded on principles, not religion
by Jonathan Seaborn, editor-in-chief
The now imperial empire known as the
United States of America is known not only for the freedoms
we have, but also the oppressions we impose.
In the last issue, there was an opinion
about how America was founded on Christian morals, and that
taking “One Nation Under God” out of the pledge, or allowing
same-sex marriage, is not what our founding fathers would
have wanted.
The Constitution is the legal document
that grants us our rights. It clearly separates church and
state, so that no one religion would rule the land. We are
not a theocracy, and for good reason. What people fail to
understand is that your religion will not always be the
majority.
A line out of the Declaration of
Independence, which is an important document in American
history but in no way is a legal document. So, the line
stating that our rights come form our creator can’t be used
in a argument about laws.
Not all of our founding fathers held
these Christian morals that the writer descried. Thomas
Jefferson was an agnostic, which is far from Christian.
Running the nation on core Christian
morals would almost dismantle the documents Americans hold
so dear. So, banning same-sex marriage is unconstitutional.
It’s immoral to Christians, not the nation as a whole. Once
again, we can’t have the morals of any religion run our
laws.
That ban would be against what some of
our founding fathers thought laws were meant for. James
Monroe talked about how laws are meant to protect property
not to limit an individual’s rights. The first 10 amendments
are there not to tell you what you can do, but what the
government can’t take away form you.
The story also talked about the need to
spearhead Democracy, which the founding fathers warned not
to do. In George Washington’s farewell address, he says, “To
not have habitual fondness or habitual hatred towards
another nation.” He also warns of getting too involved in
other nations’ problems, to stay to ourselves. Being the
superpower that we are now, staying to ourselves is
impossible. But forcing a so-called Democracy on everyone
may not be the answer.
Maybe we should spend some time fixing
our own Democratic problems before we shove it in people’s
faces. First, we are not a true Democracy. We are a
Democratic Republic, because we elect people to vote for us.
A true Democracy would be one-man, one vote.
The problem with this system in our
nation has to do with money. Campaign contributions are a
problem, because money, not votes, is now the currency of
our Democracy. It determines who runs, who wins, and who has
the ear of the elected officials.
For example 91 percent of President
George W. Bush’s campaign contributions for the 2004
election came form big business and wealthy white populated
areas. Therefore, they are worth more to him than the people
of the poorer classes in American society.
So if the elected officials need money
to run again the next election year, of course they are
going to try to please the people who have given them money
in the past.
So a large percentage of the nation is
not represented. How can we say we are a Democracy? We
can’t.
I do agree that if the founding fathers
were alive today that they would be appalled. For their
words are being misused to forward a Christian theocracy
agenda.
So, it is not our nation that forgot
where we came from, but people are not taking the time to
learn where we came from. This nation was founded on getting
away from a religious rule, not forcing one on our nation’s
people.
It is never too late to change the
things we disagree with. With protest and the ability to go
and speak with your local elected official, you can help
make these changes. If all else fails, go out and vote.