Headline News

 

Top News

 

Lemer convicted in student's murder

by Caroline Basile, editor-in-chief

The case of murdered South Plains College student Bradford McIver drew to a close recently with the conviction of the man who killed him.

On Sept. 11, Nathan Lemer, 21, plead guilty to the charge of murder  and was sentenced to 50 years in prison, with the possibility of parole. The arrest warrant indicated that robbery was Lemer’s motive for the crime.

McIver’s mother, Jackie, said that she was stunned by how fast the case went to court.

"It came about so quickly, it was kind of a shock,” Jackie McIver, the victim’s mother, told the Plainsman Press from her home in Albany. “Since he was charged, my husband and I knew that it might have taken awhile to get to court and that we had to be patient about it.”

Bradford McIver, a native of Albany, was found stabbed to death inside his Lubbock apartment on March 18, 2008. Friends discovered his body around 6:30 p.m. that evening. There were signs that a struggle had taken place inside the Indiana Village apartment where McIver was living while attending college.

Authorities in Salem, Mo., arrested Lemer, whose last known address was in Wolfforth, on April 1, several hours after he was named an official suspect in Bradford McIver’s murder. Lemer’s criminal record is littered with run-ins with the law, including three counts of felony forgery and a charge of possession of marijuana.

Authorities involved with the case came to McIver’s parents with the idea of a plea agreement. After reviewing the idea, the McIvers agreed. Lemer was originally charged with capital murder because authorities believed the crime occurred while Lemer was attempting to rob Bradford McIver.

“The district attorney approached us with a plea,” Jackie McIver said. “The good thing about this is that we avoided a trial, and now he can't go back and appeal. If there were a trial, it could've gone the either way.”

Bradford McIver was the only child of Glen and Jackie McIver, also of Albany.

“I am very thankful that it had gone over this way,” Jackie McIver said. “Nathan knew he was guilty and he knew that he faced the death penalty or life in prison."

At the time of his death, Bradford McIver, a 2006 graduate of Albany High School, was a freshman enrolled at SPC, majoring in public relations. During the Fall 2006 semester, he was a staff member of the Plainsman Press.

Present at the court hearing were Bradford’s parents, several friends and detectives who worked on the case.

 “I just want people to realize how good of a person Brad was,” said Jackie McIver. “He was a great and loyal friend. He loved everybody, and everybody loved him.”

To be eligible for parole, Lemer must serve half, or 25 years of his 50-year sentence.

“We agreed on this because it is essentially a life sentence,” McIver said. “We do not want him to be able to do this to anyone else.”

 

 

Presidency, electoral college focus of Constitution Day

by Jason Hartline, staff writer

Three members of the South Plains College Social Science Department celebrated the birth of our government with a discussion of the United States Constitution and the 2008 presidential election.

The event, conducted on Sept. 19, was hosted by Larry Norris, associate professor of government, Michael Smith, instructor of government, and Dr. Ron Carden, professor of history and chairperson of the Social Sciences Department. Numerous faculty members and students attended the Constitution Day observance.

Constitution Day is an American federal holiday that recognizes the ratification of the United States Constitution and those who have become U.S. citizens. It is celebrated on Sept. 17, to commemorate the day the U.S. Constitutional Convention signed the Constitution in 1787.

The law establishing the holiday was created in 2004 with the passage of an amendment by Senator Robert Byrd to the Omnibus Spending Bill. Before this law was enacted, the holiday was known as Citizenship Day. In addition to renaming the holiday, the act mandates that all publicly-funded educational institutions provide educational programming on the history of the United States Constitution on that day. Because Sept. 17 was on a Wednesday this year, SPC marked the occasion on the closest Friday.

In May 2005, the United States Department of Education announced the enactment of this law, and that it would apply to any school receiving federal funds of any kind. However, this holiday is not observed by granting time off work for federal employees.

Dr. Carden kicked off the event with a warm welcome and discussion of how the United States Constitution came to be. Dr. Carden also helped those in attendance to understand how the voting process for United States citizens works.

Dr. Carden went on to explain how the United States chose Tuesday as the day to vote.

“Wednesday was too far into the week, Thursday was thrown out because that’s when the British vote,” said Dr. Carden. “Saturdays were market days, and Fridays were a time to get ready for market day. They couldn’t have it on Sunday because, well, that’s the Lord’s day.”

Smith then took the floor by giving some insight into the voting process.

“You have a more likely chance of being struck by lightning while your plane is crashing down into the ocean than deciding the next president,” said Smith. “Then why vote? Because if no one did, nothing in this country would be accomplished.”

Smith then turned the discussion toward how Texas legislation works.

“Growing up in Iowa, this is my first experience with Texas legislation,” said Smith. “To get a better understanding of how things are run, I went to a Democratic convention.”

It was after Smith had said that when Constitution Day turned into more of a political rally.

Some members of the audience were very pro-Barack Obama, being Democratic supporters, and some were very pro-John McCain, being strong Republican supporters.

By the time Norris took the floor, an intense debate over political issues had overcome Constitution Day. Who would be a better candidate, Obama or McCain? Republican or Democrat? These were some of the matters discussed between the hosts and the audience.

In between the heated, unsettled political issues, an understanding of the voting process was established by Norris.

“The bottom line is when you vote, you aren’t voting for president, but a group of electors,” Norris said. “You will be indirectly voting for a new president, but you are depending on the electors to vote how the state does, even though they don’t have to.”

Despite who wins this year’s election, the process set forth by the United States Constitution doesn’t change. Who ever wins 270 electoral votes is guaranteed the next presidential seat.

“The popular vote doesn’t determine who becomes the next president,” said Norris. “If that were the case, Al Gore would be in the White House over George W.”

           



 


 
 
Copyright 2008 South Plains College