|
Lemer convicted in student's murder
by Caroline Basile, editor-in-chief
The case of murdered South Plains College student Bradford
McIver drew to a close recently with the conviction of the
man who killed him.
On Sept. 11, Nathan Lemer, 21, plead guilty to the charge of
murder and was sentenced to 50 years in prison, with the
possibility of parole. The arrest warrant indicated that
robbery was Lemer’s motive for the crime.
McIver’s mother, Jackie, said that she was stunned by how
fast the case went to court.
"It came about so quickly, it was kind of a shock,” Jackie
McIver, the victim’s mother, told the Plainsman Press from
her home in Albany. “Since he was charged, my husband and I
knew that it might have taken awhile to get to court and
that we had to be patient about it.”
Bradford McIver, a native of Albany, was found stabbed to
death inside his Lubbock apartment on March 18, 2008.
Friends discovered his body around 6:30 p.m. that evening.
There were signs that a struggle had taken place inside the
Indiana Village apartment where McIver was living while
attending college.
Authorities in Salem, Mo., arrested Lemer, whose last known
address was in Wolfforth, on April 1, several hours after he
was named an official suspect in Bradford McIver’s murder.
Lemer’s criminal record is littered with run-ins with the
law, including three counts of felony forgery and a charge
of possession of marijuana.
Authorities involved with the case came to McIver’s parents
with the idea of a plea agreement. After reviewing the idea,
the McIvers agreed. Lemer was originally charged with
capital murder because authorities believed the crime
occurred while Lemer was attempting to rob Bradford McIver.
“The district attorney approached us with a plea,” Jackie
McIver said. “The good thing about this is that we avoided a
trial, and now he can't go back and appeal. If there were a
trial, it could've gone the either way.”
Bradford McIver was the only child of Glen and Jackie
McIver, also of Albany.
“I am very thankful that it had gone over this way,” Jackie
McIver said. “Nathan knew he was guilty and he knew that he
faced the death penalty or life in prison."
At the time of his death, Bradford McIver, a 2006 graduate
of Albany High School, was a freshman enrolled at SPC,
majoring in public relations. During the Fall 2006 semester,
he was a staff member of the Plainsman Press.
Present at the court hearing were Bradford’s parents,
several friends and detectives who worked on the case.
“I just want people to realize how good of a person Brad
was,” said Jackie McIver. “He was a great and loyal friend.
He loved everybody, and everybody loved him.”
To be eligible for parole, Lemer must serve half, or 25
years of his 50-year sentence.
“We agreed on this because it is essentially a life
sentence,” McIver said. “We do not want him to be able to do
this to anyone else.”
|
|
Presidency, electoral college focus of Constitution Day by Jason Hartline, staff writer
Three members of the South Plains College Social Science
Department celebrated the birth of our government with a
discussion of the United States Constitution and the 2008
presidential election.
The event, conducted on Sept. 19, was
hosted by Larry Norris, associate professor of government,
Michael Smith, instructor of government, and Dr. Ron Carden,
professor of history and chairperson of the Social Sciences
Department. Numerous faculty members and students attended
the Constitution Day observance.
Constitution Day is an American federal holiday that
recognizes the ratification of the United States
Constitution and those who have become U.S. citizens. It is
celebrated on Sept. 17, to commemorate the day the U.S.
Constitutional Convention signed the Constitution in 1787.
The law establishing the holiday was
created in 2004 with the passage of an amendment by Senator
Robert Byrd to
the Omnibus Spending Bill. Before this law was enacted, the
holiday was known as Citizenship Day. In addition to
renaming the holiday, the act mandates that all
publicly-funded educational institutions provide educational
programming on the history of the United States Constitution
on that day. Because Sept. 17 was on a Wednesday this year,
SPC marked the occasion on the closest Friday.
In May 2005, the United States
Department of Education announced the enactment of this law,
and that it would apply to any school receiving federal
funds of any kind. However, this holiday is not observed by
granting time off work for federal employees.
Dr. Carden kicked off the event with a
warm welcome and discussion of how the United States
Constitution came to be. Dr. Carden also helped those in
attendance to understand how the voting process for United
States citizens works.
Dr. Carden went on to explain how the
United States chose Tuesday as the day to vote.
“Wednesday was too far into the week,
Thursday was thrown out because that’s when the British
vote,” said Dr. Carden. “Saturdays were market days, and
Fridays were a time to get ready for market day. They
couldn’t have it on Sunday because, well, that’s the Lord’s
day.”
Smith then took the floor by giving
some insight into the voting process.
“You have a more likely chance of being
struck by lightning while your plane is crashing down into
the ocean than deciding the next president,” said Smith.
“Then why vote? Because if no one did, nothing in this
country would be accomplished.”
Smith then turned the discussion toward
how Texas legislation works.
“Growing up in Iowa, this is my first
experience with Texas legislation,” said Smith. “To get a
better understanding of how things are run, I went to a
Democratic convention.”
It was after Smith had said that when
Constitution Day turned into more of a political rally.
Some members of the audience were very
pro-Barack Obama, being Democratic supporters, and some were
very pro-John McCain, being strong Republican supporters.
By the time Norris took the floor, an
intense debate over political issues had overcome
Constitution Day. Who would be a better candidate, Obama or
McCain? Republican or Democrat? These were some of the
matters discussed between the hosts and the audience.
In between the heated, unsettled
political issues, an understanding of the voting process was
established by Norris.
“The bottom line is when you vote, you
aren’t voting for president, but a group of electors,”
Norris said. “You will be indirectly voting for a new
president, but you are depending on the electors to vote how
the state does, even though they don’t have to.”
Despite who wins this year’s election,
the process set forth by the United States Constitution
doesn’t change. Who ever wins 270 electoral votes is
guaranteed the next presidential seat.
“The popular vote doesn’t determine who
becomes the next president,” said Norris. “If that were the
case, Al Gore would be in the White House over George W.”
| |
|